Women-Focused Cardiovascular Rehabilitation: An International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Clinical Practice Guideline

Women-focused cardiovascular rehabilitation (CR; phase II) aims to better engage women, and might result in better quality of life than traditional programs. This first clinical practice guideline by the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (ICCPR) provides guidance on how to deliver women-focused programming. The writing panel comprised experts with diverse geographic representation, including multidisciplinary health care providers, a policy-maker, and patient partners. The guideline was developed in accordance with Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II and the Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealTh care (RIGHT). Initial recommendations were on the basis of a meta-analysis. These were circulated to a Delphi panel (comprised of corresponding authors from review articles and of programs delivering women-focused CR identified through ICCPR’s audit; N = 76), who were asked to rate each on a 7-point Likert scale in terms of impact and implementability (higher scores positive). A Web call was convened to achieve consensus; 15 panelists confirmed strength of revised recommendations (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation [GRADE]). The draft underwent external review from CR societies internationally and was posted for public comment. The 14 drafted recommendations related to referral (systematic, encouragement), setting (model choice, privacy, staffing), and delivery (exercise mode, psychosocial, education, self-management empowerment). Nineteen (25.0%) survey responses were received. For all but 1 recommendation, ≥ 75% voted to include; implementability ratings were < 5/7 for 4 recommendations, but only 1 for effect. Ultimately 1 recommendation was excluded, 1 separated into 2 and all revised (2 substantively); 1 recommendation was added. Overall, certainty of evidence for the final recommendations was low to moderate, and strength mostly strong. These recommendations and associated tools can support all programs to feasibly offer some women-focused programming.     

基于标准化患者法评价四川农村基层医生两种慢性病诊断准确性及其影响因素

目的 运用标准化患者法评估四川农村地区基层医生不稳定型心绞痛和2型糖尿病两种慢性病诊断准确性现状,探讨基层医生两种慢性病诊断准确性的主要影响因素,为提升基层医生两种慢性病诊断准确性提供科学依据。方法 采用多阶段随机整群抽样方法,抽取四川省自贡市5个区/县50个乡镇100个村为研究现场,以调查当日在岗的全科及内科医生作为研究对象。共进行两轮数据采集,第1轮采集样本乡镇卫生院和村卫生室医生的基本信息;第1轮调查完成1个月后,运用标准化患者法开展第2轮调查,收集农村基层医生对不稳定型心绞痛和2型糖尿病诊断结果信息。运用Logistic回归分析农村基层医生不稳定型心绞痛和2型糖尿病诊断准确性的影响因素。结果 共纳入172名农村基层医生,完成186次标准化患者访问,正确诊断率为48.39%。其中不稳定型心绞痛的正确诊断率为18.68%(17/91),2型糖尿病的正确诊断率为76.84%(73/95)。Logistic回归分析显示,具有执业医师资质的农村基层医生更有可能做出正确诊断(OR=4.857,95%CI=1.076~21.933,P=0.040)。农村基层医生在诊断过程中涉及的必要问诊和检查条目越多,做出正确诊断的概率越高(OR=1.627,95%CI=1.065~2.485,P=0.024)。与不稳定型心绞痛相比,农村基层医生对2型糖尿病做出正确诊断的可能性更高(OR=6.306,95%CI=3.611~11.013,P<0.001)。结论 四川农村基层医生不稳定型心绞痛和2型糖尿病诊断准确性整体较差,建议以基层医生慢性病诊断过程质量改善为突破口,提升基层医生执业水平,进而提高慢性病诊断准确性。     

Femoropopliteal Arterial Dissections Following FLEX VP and Balloon Angioplasty Versus Balloon Angioplasty Alone: Intravascular Ultrasound Assessment and Correlation With Angiographic Findings

BackgroundThe Flex VP is a longitudinal micro-incision catheter approved for vessel prepping of femoropopliteal arteries and arteriovenous fistulas. In this study, we evaluated the presence of deep dissections (adventitia) using IVUS in patients undergoing Flex VP followed by angioplasty (PTA) versus PTA alone.Methods17 patients (20 limbs) with femoropopliteal artery (FP) disease were prospectively and consecutively included (10 limbs received PTA followed by 10 limbs that received FLEX VP microincision catheter treatment followed by adjunctive PTA). Dissections post PTA, FLEX VP and FLEX VP+ PTA were evaluated using intravascular ultrasound (iDissection classification) and angiographically (NHLBI classification) by core laboratory. The evaluated segment of the vessel was prespecified at 10 cm at the most severe lesion location. Statistical differences were analyzed between the 2 groups at each appropriate procedural point for dissections, minimal luminal diameter (MLD), minimal luminal area (MLA), and residual stenosis. Statistical significance was determined by a p-value <0.05.ResultsBaseline demographics and angiographic variables were similar between the PTA vs FLEX VP + PTA groups with the exception of more males (87.5 % vs 33.3 %, p = 0.0274) and longer treated length (median 300 mm vs 150 mm, p = 0.0240) in the FLEX VP + PTA group. Lesion length, chronic total occlusions, angiographic and IVUS evaluated segment length for dissections, calcium severity and final balloon pressures and inflation duration were all similar between the 2 groups. Angiographic dissections were similar between the 2 groups but the increase in severe dissections from index to post POBA on IVUS (involving the adventitia) were significantly more for PTA when compared to FLEX VP + PTA (0 to 12 and 0 to 1 respectively, p = 0.0353). Bailout stenting was statistically similar for PTA as compared to FLEX VP + PTA per core lab evaluation (50 % vs 20 %, p = 0.3498). Minimal luminal area (MLA) gain by IVUS was similar between the 2 groups following FLEX VP + PTA vs PTA (7.4 mm² vs 6.5 mm², p = 0.7250). No serious major adverse events occurred in either group.ConclusionVessel prepping with the FLEX VP + PTA vs PTA yielded lower rates of adventitial dissections as seen on IVUS. The long-term outcomes of these findings remain unclear.